City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York
Writing for the entire SCOTUS, minus J. John Paul Stevens, who wrote a dissenting opinion, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg wrote that:
The Oneidas claimed that because the Sherrill properties, located 30 miles east of Syracuse, N.Y., were once part of a 300,000-acre stretch of their land they were no longer taxable by state and local officials after the tribe purchased them in 1997. The City of Sherrill differed. At issue, the taxes on a gas station, a convenience store and a defunct T-shirt factory. The date when the Oneida left the area of Sherrill, 1815.
For those of you who take an interest in the passage of time in the American courts, in the 2001 session the Court decided New Hampshire v. Maine 532 U.S. 742 (2001). The issue in New Hampshire v. Maine was the tax jurisdiction over Seavy Island in the Piscataqua. The deciding language was taken from a 1740 decree of King George II delimiting the Colony of New Hamphsire from the Northern Extent of the Massachusetts Bay Colony (now Maine) -- "Middle of the River".
Yes. J. Ruth Bader Ginsberg wrote the majority opinion in New Hampshire v. Maine in 2001.
Municipalities are always concerned when properties are taken off the tax rolls through title transfer to tax exempt entities, and I'll be happy to take counsel, but I've never heard anyone at a planning or zoning board or citry council take the position that the United States or the Catholic Church or some 501(c)(3) entity should be subject to municipal taxation because taking a property off the muni tax roles would be disruptive to the city budget.
Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that the decision "is at war with at least two bedrock principles of Indian law: (1) "that only Congress can reduce a tribe's reservation" and (2) "change a reservation's tax status".
He managed not to write that Ruth Bader Ginsberg actually managed to practice racism today, in addition to some fairly rediculous SCOTUS inconsistency, and if anybody doesn't know what first order magnitude of transfer of authority took place today in Sherrill, Plenary Powers, thought to be reserved to the United States Senate under Art. II, section 2, may now be exercised by the smallest city in New York State, with approximately 3,200 residents. On the bright side, J. Ginsberg didn't actually transfer Art I, section 8 powers to the City of Sherrill. That would be really entertaining.
The slip is here.
Comments
It's always in the interest of the conqueror to say "let bygones be bygones," "what is past is past," and "that was a very long time ago."
We Indians are used to being told that what the Great White Father does is in our best interest. The Dawes Act of 1887, the Reorganization Act of 1934, the Indian Claims Commission Act of 1946
all promised to do good things for Indians. All had the effect of taking land or of legitimizing the past taking. Just as did the ruling issued today.
Posted by: Meteor Blades | March 30, 2005 02:10 AM
OIN could [should] have asked the DOI to take the land into Trust. Exit City of Sherrill and State of New York.
Now you know what to do with your glass of rosé the next time some nice Democrat at a fern bar tells you that the Nice Liberal Jewish Woman Justice isn't a Rehnquist Racist.
Oblig Deaniac Edu Moment of Zen: Vermont's defense to Abenaki claims to sacred ground and state eugenics records were ... History makes Law (passage of time plus force vacates Treaty) and single unified jurisdiction. During his terms in office, Howard embrassed these.
Posted by: Eric | March 30, 2005 05:20 AM