Order the importance to the American state the following:
Now compare with this set:
If you answered that the acquisition of the Philippines, Guam and Puerto Rico arising out of the war 1898 war with Spain was the first in the ordered list of notable territorial acquisitions by the United States in the 19th century, followed by the strip of land between the Rio Brazos and the Rio Grande in 1847/8, and the territories north of the Gila river (pop. 5,000 non-Indians), and sleepy California (pop. 5,000 non-Indians), and last and least worthy of note the middle Mississippi and east to the Alleghenies croplands and woodlands, then the following should read comfortably:
... the principal method by which the United States became a continental hegemon during the 19th century was by preempting perceived dangers along an expanding frontier. The Spanish, the Mexicans, and the native Americans can tell you more about that.
It is amazing that an academic can frame the expansion of American state power in the 19th century as preempting perceived dangers, whether or not, a century later Washington is held by a regime that messages that its military adventures abroad are preempting perceived dangers. More amazing is that an academic could order the benefits of a century of aggression so that the most substantial, the fruit of massacre, death march, and mass execution, the ethnic clensing of the eastern United States, not to mention over half of the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, where over half of its population resides and material wealth originates and renews from -- are an after-thought. After a nice little war with a European power and the second conquest of Mexico, which between them generated only a few thousand deaths among the American military, and were conducted safely "away".
It is as if a white man taught that cotton raised itself. Not just any white man, but the Robert A. Lovett Professor of History and Political Science at Yale University. Via Escheton.
There are other problems with John Gaddis' Grant Lecture at Middlebury College. He neatly erases intelligence services in Moscow, Paris, Berlin, Beijing, Dehli, and Islamabad that held incorrect views on the Bush-Blair WMD pretext, and resurects John Quincy Adams to put an "I agree with _____" balloon coming out of his mouth so that “the United States goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy.” Being recycled is an occupational hazard of the dead.
Vermont has a problem with Abenakis, so John Gaddis was well received at Middlebury College.
Posted by EBW at May 22, 2005 03:14 AM | TrackBack