The last Autism Open Thread is about to fall off the front page, so here is another. Just to provide a little grist for us to grind, please allow me to note the following:
Natasha at Pacific Views links to and discusses an article about new neurologial research on autism and face perception. Natasha writes:
In autistic children, an overactive amygdala causes them to perceive all faces as somewhat threatening, leading them to want to look away. The March issue of National Geographic is out, and research cited in its leading article on the mind indicates that even in adults, brain regions can shrink or grow their active connections within weeks of uncharacteristic use or disuse. Persistent disuse of the region responsible for face recognition seems to cause it to atrophy, but the lack of a fundamental problem with this area is a great source of hope for future therapy for autistics of all ages.
I will withhold comment on a report (thanks Moi) that Merck continued selling infant vaccines containing thimerosal until 2001, two years after the risks were known. I have a rule against writing about such things when I am this angry.
In Chicago, a Special Ed teacher has been removed from the classroom and reassigned to administrative duty after she bit a nine-year-old autistic student on the stomach during the boy's tantrum. I think she got off pretty easy. There are plenty of ways to handle autistic tantrums by a nine-year-old without biting. And, believe me, I should know.
A lawsuit in Oregon caught my eye.
Max Lehman is a 46-year-old autistic man. He, apparently, is rather large, as his lawyer has described him as a “gentle giant”. Lehman has no language and communicates only through grunts and gestures. He has a “measured” IQ of 20.
Lehman wandered away from the group home where he lives and was walking down the middle of a busy street, blocking traffic when found by a police officer.
The officer tried to talk to him without success. Allegedly, the police officer then tried to physically stop Lehman. Lehman’s lawyer contends that Lehman does not like to be touched, recoiled from the officer, and kept moving away.
"He made no aggressive movements," Engle said of Lehman's actions. "But Max is autistic. . . . And autistic people don't like to be touched."
Once the backup arrived, three officers subdued Lehman through physical force. Lehman’s arm was broken in the struggle.
The officer contends that his actions were completely appropriate.
Wagner, the defense attorney, argued that Snider's actions were appropriate to the situation."He can't tell what's wrong with him," Wagner said. "Traffic is backed up. Lehman is walking down the middle of Main Street. He can tell something is wrong with him. . . . He could be on drugs, or a mental patient."
Wagner said that Lehman carried no identification, that he continued to pull violently away from Snider and that he was uncooperative. All his training, Wagner said, told Snider that he couldn't let Lehman get away from him and get into the house he was heading for…
The blame for what happened that day, Wagner argued again and again, lies squarely with the employees of the group home, who were never supposed to let Lehman out of their sight.
"The group home was not supposed to let him off the property," Wagner said. "There is no amount of training that would have helped the officers in this situation."
He added that Lehman's attorney would have the officers know not only how to deal with developmentally disabled people but also "diagnose them, too."
And yes, I think police officers should be trained to recognize autistic behavior and be trained in how to deal with autistics.
I am not sure how much, if any, blame should be placed on the officer. He was confronted with a difficult situaltion and he had not received the training needed to handle it. I do blame the police department for not providing the proper training.
That is a lot of grist to grind. Please choose one or more of those to discuss, or if you prefer, some other autism related topic. The floor is open.
So many people to blame here. And I agree, Dwight: autistic people aren't that hard to pick out once you know what to look for. Dennis Debbaudt, people. Dennis Debbaudt.
Posted by: emily at March 9, 2005 10:04 AMWhen I am this angry, I call a lawyer. Waiting for the class action to hit. I have finally found my son's records, and the ones from before he was 2 years old don't have any drug info records on them (dates, expirations, etc.).
BTW I tried to comment on Natasha's blog - don't know if it came up, didn't see it - but I think that the word "threatening" is a bit much. I was of the opinion (not sure where I read or heard this) that autistics look away because the face and most especially the eyes are *distracting* to them. They can't focus when they are looking at the face. I would think that would be a negative thing, too....so the word "threatening" is a bit much, IMO.
Posted by: Moi ;) at March 9, 2005 06:22 PMMoi:
"Threatening" may or may not be too strong a word but it is not Natasha's word. She links to this story. The lead paragraph is:
Brain tests have suggested that autistic children shy from eye contact because they perceive even the most familiar face as an uncomfortable threat.Posted by: dwight Meredith at March 9, 2005 06:49 PM
Actually, I usually have comments at my blog, but that post got attacked by a spambot & I closed it. Sorry.
But you know, a number of things overstimulate autistic spectrum people that don't affect others. Is it farfetched to think that overstimulation is the result of a perception of threat where none should be? Is autism in part a case of permanent high anxiety caused by the continuous presence of apparent danger?
It sounds somewhat reasonable to me, anyway. But have you ever observed your emotional state when your pulse was racing? Or found that you were anxious and realized that it was a physical reaction because something got your adrenalin going and now all your senses are on edge looking for the problem? Even food reactions and hormone imbalances can kick off a cocktail of alarm signals. It's all down to an overstimulation that the brain misinterprets, that it is in fact trained to misinterpret.
Our socialization usually teaches us what to be alarmed about, we learn by watching others. What if that learning experience itself is misconstrued? But, you know, just speculating.
Posted by: natasha at March 10, 2005 01:18 AMI know that wasn't Natasha's word. I just don't like it. I know that my son feels anxious at times, but that is also not the same as threatened. He feels anxious because he is overwhelmed. I think the word "threatened" seems like they are talking about physical danger. It's just dumb rhetoric, I guess. :)
BTW gang, I created a petition at Petition Online - trying to get us all some tax relief - sign it and please, pass it on!!
http://www.petitiononline.com/txbrk456/petition.html
Posted by: Moi ;) at March 11, 2005 11:11 AMHiya, great blog!
I live in Oregon, and missed the story you refer to...but I have a 15 year old who is a big kid and occasionally prone to aggressive outbursts--like less than 5% of the time--but occasionally scary. Like the man in the story, he is non-verbal and can be quite headstrong in these situations. I live in fear that he will be at school or on a field trip and have an and that some cop will taser him...it's happened to 'normal' kids elsewhere, and much younger at that (I think one story I read mentioned a 6 year old, and another kid was 11).
People in law enforcement and the public in general need to be better educated about autism and its behavioral manifestations. As you so rightly point out, people with autism don't act 'like they'r on drugs'--they act like people who have autism.
Keep up the great work!
Posted by: celticgirl at March 14, 2005 01:51 AM