January 27, 2005 October is Koufax Pledge Drive month

one and one and one is free

I'm getting a lot of letters currently, none of them actually personal, more of the you used to be a max contributor, so you're probably in the target market kind of letters. The general outline is help determine the future of the Democratic Party, check one of three boxes and/or sign here and send the signed check.

In Maine (and possibly elsewhere), the party apparatus in Augusta and Portland are running scorched-earth campaigns against Progressives. Baldacci creamed Pingree in the secret pre-primary for Governor, then pulled the final GOTV in Cumberland and York to cut Jonathan Carter's numbers, and push Pingree down well below the MOE in her race against Susan Collins. Its only gotten worse since the '02 cycle, and the knives will drink again in the '06 cycle. I don't know why the Ku-Dems bother to stay in-Party.

I'm not a Maine Democrat any more. I stood for Kucinich at the caucuses and went to the State convention as a Ku-Delegate, but I am not a Maine Democrat any more.

So I'm in a quandry about the who-should-chair-the-DNC thing. Dean or ¬Dean, as a nominal Green.

I'm not in a quandry about what the Opposition should be when the electorate decides, as they must, in two, or four, or more years, that continuity in time of war isn't their choice. When the knock on the door is the telegram from the War Department, that moment will come. FDR's moment came when the knock on the door was the three-day-pay-or-quit. The Roosevelt/Morgenthau program was deficit spending, and there was no middle ground, no "reasonable position" with the Hoover/Mellon program of deficit reduction.

The Opposition should be the Opposition. Not for "stay the course with" the Incumbency. Not for "principled differences from" the Incumbency. Opposed. The Democrats are not the Opposition. Opposition isn't Party, any more than Incumbency is Party. Opposition is what most Americans deride or ignore, until they deride or ignore Incumbency, and make Incumbent Opposition, and Opposition Incumbent.

Dean lacks this in the its-the-economy-stupid space, the Roosevelt/Morgenthau space.

Dean has this in the its-the-war-stupid space, what I think of as the Roosevelt/Hull space. The don't-rush-to-the-wrong-dance space.

In October 2002 I was drafting a memo for the Internet Engineering Task Force, and listening to the rhetorical run-up to the invasion of Iraq. Paul Wellstone would be silenced forever in just a few days. The newsreaders and the normative voices of NPR were giggling at one old man trying to stop the vote for the war. I added this note:

This draft is dedicated to Robert C. Byrd, Senator from West Virginia.

Robert C. Byrd was a member of a certain organization. Abenakis had issues with Gov. Howard Dean.

At present, a majority of Americans say they don't belive their country ought to get into a land war in Asia, but they believe their country can can wage and win a land war in Asia.

At present, a majority of Americans say they believe in distribution of wealth, but they belive this can be achived through policies that concentrate wealth.

If Dean chairs the DNC, the Democrats in Maine can continue to treat Progressives as they do today, but like the window in the Treaty Wampum between the Mic'mac and the Vatican, which places an open window in the walls of the Church as a condition for the Church to be on Mic'mac land, Progressives will be free to pass in and out of that window carefully set in the walls of Party. If Simon Rosenberg chairs the DNC, the same is likely to be true also. A window in the walls of Party. I don't think the other candidates for chair of the DNC see a blank wall, let alone the lack of, or necessity for, a window.

The knock on the door may take much longer than one cycle. It took the French from 1954 to 1962 to internalize what 117 minutes of film makes self-evident. Dean-as-Chair may not deliver any branch of government in the midterms, or the next general. ¬ Dean-as-Chair also may not deliver any branch of government in the midterms, or the next general. At some point however, unless the United States can wage and win a land war in Asia, and distribute wealth by concentrating wealth, an election will go to the Opposition.

The Dean or ¬ Dean issue is really about what the Opposition is, when the Americans choose to make it Incumbent. Will enough of it be "inside" the Democratic Party, or will the real transfer of power, and the transfer of shared fates, have to wait even longer? Bush followed by a stay-the-course, peace-with-honor Democrat is a real possibility in '08, and that's at the $150bn-1kKIA-10kMEDEVAC annual burn rate, unadjusted for domestic economy or policy, or additional military deployments.

When the Americans look for a better choice, will it be actually available at the ballot box?

Dean for DNC. Warts and all. Abenaki first, nominal Green second.

Posted by EBW at January 27, 2005 09:19 AM | TrackBack
Comments

The Democrat's leadership should be shouting from the rooftops everytime Bush tries pulling a fast one....repeat,repeat,repeat...Pell Grants? What did he say in the debates and what is really happening? Cost of the War is like the cost of Social Security Reform. The congress should refuse to even consider his proposal if he isn't willing to offer up his plan for how much it will cost. I agree with the choice of Dean,warts in all, because if he is nothing else, he is a "celebrity",like it or not, because of his "Scream". If you are going to "get The Message" out, you need someone who cannot be ignored.

Posted by: zencomix at January 27, 2005 12:14 PM

I was for Kucinich in the beginning, too. [I'm an ex-Clevelander.] I didn't care for Howard until *after* the scream. As odd as everyone tried to make him sound post-scream only seemed to accentuate his genuinely good attributes. I agree that he can 'get the message out.'

The '04 election was my first as a dem[I'm a reformed -- Rockette -- please, no applause!] and I'd like to mention also how great it is to finally start hearing John Kerry rattle some chains again after the quiet post-election period. :)

Diana
The Write Wing

[how's that? ebw]

Posted by: Diana at January 27, 2005 07:53 PM

Eww, I can't edit that and remove the mention of being a former you know what? Ah, well. :p

Posted by: Diana at January 27, 2005 07:55 PM

Sorry for the mess in ME. The spelling should be Simon Rosenberg on the DNC Chair race.

In any case I say you've got to use the army you've got and that means either fielding the insurgents to retake the Dems in ME and helping others stand for reform, or conversely building a serious minded Green Party that might actually take some seats someplace. Both will take time. History suggests with an agenda it's easier to tear down what is rotten and reform what you've got, but again that may take more time than we've got. I've got fairly smart friends now who give odds that we won't make it. Is there a dead pool for the American Experience? (I know, the obvious answer is 'You're soaking in it Hon!)

Posted by: VJ at January 28, 2005 04:22 AM

I'm sticking with the Democratic Party. The Democrats have a better chance than any other party of unseating some of these republicans in the Senate in '06. Hopefully, enough seats will be gained back to correct the mistakes the 'phants have made in many areas.

[is that the Democratic Party with, or without Progressives, and with, or without opposition to the defining policies of the incumbency? If the Dean or ¬Dean for DNC question isn't about those issues, who cares? ebw]

Posted by: Steve Plonk at January 28, 2005 10:39 AM

Rockette? LOL! Okay, I'll take it. :)

Posted by: Diana at January 29, 2005 02:51 PM