24 hours post-event:
"It's looking more like indirect fire," said Col. Joseph Curtin, an Army
spokesman in Washington, meaning weapons like mortars, artillery shells or
rockets. If it was indirect fire, it is not clear whether the strike was a
random hit or whether insurgents somehow obtained coordinates of the dining
tent.In Mosul, officials said that there was a single explosion, and that its
shrapnel created uniform perforations in metal kitchen appliances and other
objects, as if ball bearings or similar projectiles had been part of the
explosive device.
For the missile to be accurate, it must be fired from a pre-surveyed site against a target whose coordinates are exactly known according to a common grid. The targeting problem is more serious than it may appear because the world is not perfectly round, and locating launch site and target to precisely the same standard of measurement requires both sites to be measured using a common system.
This wasn't just another car bomber who got lucky.
Source: http://www.csis.org/burke/reports/941015lessonsgulfIV-chap11.pdf
See also: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iraq/mosul-airbase.htm
Nice "guess," EBW.
Posted by: Peatey at December 22, 2004 11:11 AM