So sayeth the EPA:
Scientists at EPA and environmentalists questioned whether the government should give participating families $970 plus a camcorder and children's clothes, saying it might encourage low-income families to use pesticides in their homes.
The study in question, one whose protocol was already approved by four independent sources, including two universities, is to test for the effects of household pesticides and flame retardants on children.
The EPA is not concerned, however, that it's sold it's own soul:
EPA also had agreed to accept $2 million for the $9 million study from the American Chemistry Council, a trade group that represents chemical makers.
The study will be now be delayed until at least Spring, 2005, while yet another independent source reviews the protocols. Why not just let the American Chemical Council review it, while we're at it?