If, as we keep being told, the fight against terrorism must not be approached from a law enforcement perspective but rather must be combated militarily, one question remains. Which country should Spain invade?
Posted by Dwight Meredith at March 29, 2004 12:37 PM | TrackBackWell, obviously Afganistan, its not as if these are mutually exclusive theaters of operations. Then, it is obviously Lybia because of the WMD, er, well, sartorial offenses of that Green Book waving oil company nationalizing Naderite, or Ethiopia, because the Spanish would really rather be Italians, and there's an old score to settle, one that scuttled the LoN back in the late '30s.
Antarcistan maybe?
Posted by: Eric at March 29, 2004 04:58 PMBrilliant.
Posted by: Ted Barlow at March 29, 2004 05:20 PMThe Bush administration's answer would be, "Iraq, of course." Not so much that Spain needs to invade, of course, but that they need to "stay the course," since Iraq is now the "front line in the global war on terror."
Posted by: PaulB at March 30, 2004 09:37 AMEngland. Spain should invade England because (1) that's where a bunch of explosives and bomb making gear were seized, even though that effort doesn't really count in the WOT because it was a l** enf****ment operation and not a hairy chested WAAAAAR; and (2) Spain tried it once before, and they've probably still got the plans and stuff.
Posted by: John Casey at March 31, 2004 06:00 PM