The nine finalists for the 2003 Koufax Award for the Best Non-Liberal Blog (the “Drysdale”) are listed below.
An Unsealed Room by Allison Kaplan Sommer
Just One Minute by Tom McGuire
The Light of Reason by Arthur Silber
Unqualified Offerings by Jim Henley
The Volokh Conspiracy.
Please vote for one finalist by comment or email.
One vote for Jim Henley, Unqualified Offerings
Posted by: jam at January 24, 2004 01:51 PMLight of Reason
Posted by: BudMan at January 24, 2004 03:06 PMI say High Clearing — but Dan Drezner runs a very close second. [And I still can't figure out why the Talking Dog is here.]
Posted by: Greg Greene at January 24, 2004 03:23 PM[High Clearing = Jim Henley, BTW.]
Posted by: Greg Greene at January 24, 2004 03:24 PMLight of Reason
Posted by: Al-Muhajabah at January 24, 2004 03:43 PMTacitus
Posted by: Linnaeus at January 24, 2004 03:50 PMLight of Reason is my choice. Nothing like a bit of cold fury in the morning...
Posted by: Scaramouche at January 24, 2004 04:19 PMTacitus
Posted by: pontificator at January 24, 2004 04:25 PMHenley
Posted by: 3pointshooter at January 24, 2004 04:37 PMAm I really being grouped with LGF? Huh.
Anyway, while I'm secretly voting in my heart for myself, I'll say Henley.
Posted by: Tacitus at January 24, 2004 04:39 PMTacitus
Posted by: Thor Heyerdahl at January 24, 2004 05:04 PMTacitus
Posted by: Neolith at January 24, 2004 05:05 PMPut me down for Tacitus.
The Volokh Conspiracy. (at least the volokh part)
Posted by: #defy at January 24, 2004 05:25 PMI wouldn't group Tacitus with LGF, (although their respective jihads intersect quite frequently)
But I wouldn't vote for him either.
Put me down for Henley, please!
Posted by: Senior Administration Official at January 24, 2004 05:34 PMAn Unsealed Room.
Tacitus.
Posted by: Aaron at January 24, 2004 06:14 PMsorry, split ticket. Tacitus/Henley.
Posted by: Katherine at January 24, 2004 06:17 PMTacitus
Posted by: Jer at January 24, 2004 06:26 PMLight of Reason
Posted by: Jeanie Renae at January 24, 2004 06:58 PMTo quote the great Admiral Stockdale: Who am I? Why am I here?
Since no one else seems to be voting for me, I'll be declasse and vote for myself. As my good friend Julia said in the nominating round, "Talking Dog, because why should a conservative win this award?"
Posted by: the talking dog at January 24, 2004 07:12 PMTD:
I was going to disqualify you on the grounds that I agree with you about almost everything and I know I am a liberal but Julia's comment made so much sense I couldn't do it.
Drezner
Posted by: Kevin Hayden at January 24, 2004 07:53 PMTacitus.
Posted by: caleb at January 24, 2004 07:55 PMLight of Reason
Posted by: Patrick Taylor at January 24, 2004 07:58 PMI vote Drezner, although I almost voted TD.
Posted by: Kevin at January 24, 2004 08:52 PMI like Talking Dog. One vote, please.
Posted by: satiRic air tanK at January 24, 2004 09:08 PMHenley
Posted by: JakeV at January 24, 2004 10:09 PMAnyone but Tacitus who is too much like LGF. One vote for Drezner
Posted by: Mike at January 24, 2004 10:11 PMTacitus
Posted by: spc67 at January 24, 2004 10:12 PMGotta be Tacitus for me.
Posted by: Trickster at January 24, 2004 10:17 PMTacitus.
Posted by: Aaron at January 24, 2004 10:21 PMDrezner
Posted by: vee at January 24, 2004 10:25 PMUnqualified Offerings
Posted by: Zack at January 24, 2004 10:41 PMUnqualified Offerings - Jim Henley
Posted by: Nell Lancaster at January 24, 2004 10:55 PMTacitus
Posted by: LoneOne at January 24, 2004 11:03 PMTacitus.
Posted by: Moe Lane at January 24, 2004 11:21 PMAnother liberal for Tacitus.
Posted by: Joel Nickelson at January 24, 2004 11:25 PMAnother liberal for Tacitus.
Posted by: Joel at January 24, 2004 11:25 PMDrezner
Posted by: David at January 24, 2004 11:26 PMOops, sorry about the double post there.
Posted by: Joel at January 24, 2004 11:28 PMTacitus
Posted by: Timmy the Wonder Dog at January 24, 2004 11:34 PMOne for Drezner.
Posted by: rps at January 24, 2004 11:46 PMA few months ago I'd have voted Silber hands down, but lately he's given up his tempered, cool demeanor in favour of a more shrill tone. Which is a shame, since levelheadedness was what made him a breath of fresh air to read.
So instead I'll say... advantage: Drezner.
Posted by: Andy Danger at January 24, 2004 11:56 PMOne for Drezner please.
Posted by: Nick at January 25, 2004 12:07 AMThe Light of Reason
Posted by: P6 at January 25, 2004 12:17 AMTacitus, of course
Posted by: edsez at January 25, 2004 12:18 AMTacitus
Posted by: MattK/D1 at January 25, 2004 12:29 AMTalking Dog. Grrrrrrrr.
Posted by: Jo Fish at January 25, 2004 12:31 AMTacitus
Posted by: PB at January 25, 2004 12:34 AMHenley. I don't consider the Dog to be non-liberal.
Posted by: Zizka at January 25, 2004 12:42 AMTacitus
Posted by: arc at January 25, 2004 12:44 AMVolokh
Posted by: Skip Perry at January 25, 2004 01:11 AMUnqualified Offerings, Jim Henley
Posted by: Dave Trowbridge at January 25, 2004 01:12 AMTacitus.
Posted by: grubi at January 25, 2004 01:21 AMVolokh, but tough call.
Posted by: arsin at January 25, 2004 01:26 AMUnqualified Offerings by Jim Henley
Henley.
Posted by: Darius Bacon at January 25, 2004 02:39 AMTacitus.
Posted by: Arkhangel at January 25, 2004 02:45 AMCalling The Talking Dog "non-liberal" is like mistaking a mastiff for a toy poodle. I like mastiffs, though, so one bow-wow for the chattering canine.
Posted by: DP at January 25, 2004 02:53 AMOne vote for Drezner
Posted by: Infidel at January 25, 2004 02:57 AMdang, I've convinced me too. The Dog, please
Posted by: julia at January 25, 2004 04:40 AMThe Talking Dog.
Posted by: Ivan G. at January 25, 2004 05:35 AMTacitus
Posted by: Mario at January 25, 2004 05:37 AMThe Volokh Conspiracy
Posted by: Pam Godbout at January 25, 2004 06:13 AMTacitus
Posted by: jerseycityjoan at January 25, 2004 07:03 AMLight of Reason
Posted by: Bert at January 25, 2004 07:55 AMtacitus.
Posted by: Opus at January 25, 2004 08:28 AMTacitus.
Posted by: daver at January 25, 2004 08:47 AMHenley
Posted by: Melinda at January 25, 2004 08:59 AMJim Henley/Unqualified Offerings
Posted by: dublingal_ny at January 25, 2004 09:25 AMLight of Reason
Posted by: W at January 25, 2004 09:25 AMTacitus
Posted by: Bill S. at January 25, 2004 09:45 AMLight of Reason.
Posted by: Mithras at January 25, 2004 10:25 AMt a c i t u s
Posted by: freemti at January 25, 2004 11:28 AMI vote for Tacitus.
Political debate and best all around husband tracking site.
Tacitus!
"But apart from the sanitation, medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh water system and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?"
Drezner.
Posted by: Mrs Tilton at January 25, 2004 12:16 PMHenley.
Posted by: Gene at January 25, 2004 12:24 PMI'll go with Drezner
Posted by: nick danger at January 25, 2004 12:25 PMLight of Reason
Posted by: J at January 25, 2004 12:32 PMTacitus
Posted by: Jimmy at January 25, 2004 01:01 PMTacticus
Posted by: jennetic at January 25, 2004 01:32 PMliberal for Tacitus.
Posted by: Jordan at January 25, 2004 01:37 PMIs Tacitus really going to win this? Are people not reading his co-bloggers, or something?
Dan Drezner
Posted by: Keith at January 25, 2004 01:43 PMLight of Reason gets my vote or its intellectual honesty.
Posted by: p m barnard at January 25, 2004 01:49 PMTacitus
Posted by: Sabaron at January 25, 2004 01:56 PMIf Volokh Conspiracy were just Eugene Volokh (with maybe an occasional post from Sasha) he'd get my vote. But he has too many idiot co-posters; and, of course, he hasn't enabled comments. So no vote for Eugene. That means either Drezner or Silber for me; I guess I prefer Silber.
1. The Light of Reason
2. Dan Drezner
3. Tacitus
Jesus, tacitus is going to win again? WTF? That guy is a whacko. He's fair about half the time, which isn't fair at all.
Arthur Silbur's stuff is golden. Do you people even read non-liberal blogs?
The Light of Reason by Arthur Silber is my vote.
Posted by: Rusty at January 25, 2004 02:45 PMTacitus
Posted by: Manish at January 25, 2004 02:55 PMTacitus -- best debate on the net.
Posted by: Brutus at January 25, 2004 02:58 PMTacitus.
Posted by: Tree Lover at January 25, 2004 03:15 PMTacitus.
Posted by: Brian Alexander at January 25, 2004 03:20 PMMust act altruistic.... impress liberal readers... don't vote for self!
After careful consideration, I'll vote for Volokh.
Excellent job, Drezner. They'll be eating out of the palm of your hand from now on
Posted by: Daniel Drezner at January 25, 2004 03:24 PMTacitus
Posted by: Matthew at January 25, 2004 03:46 PMTacitus.
Posted by: mc_masterchef at January 25, 2004 03:50 PMUnqualified Offerings : Jim Henley
Posted by: Bones at January 25, 2004 03:52 PMBy the way, have you looked at Tacitus lately judges? It's turned into a group blog, Tacitus is a minority player. Only some of his contributors are righties, and the non-Tacitus righties are more LGF quality than anything else.
He really shouldn't even be up for this category.
Jim Henley, Unqualified Offerings. Even when I disagree with his conclusions, his discussions are among the best in the field.
Posted by: Kevin J. Maroney at January 25, 2004 04:40 PMThe Talking Dog
Posted by: obruni at January 25, 2004 04:56 PMTacitus
Posted by: whereswebb at January 25, 2004 05:04 PMTacitus, please.
Posted by: angua at January 25, 2004 05:18 PMTacitus
Posted by: Ron Hawkins at January 25, 2004 05:33 PMLOR
Posted by: vachon at January 25, 2004 06:01 PMIt's got to be The Light of Reason, well written and forceful. Tacitus? No, not reasoned enough, else he'd be a liberal!
Posted by: Duckman GR at January 25, 2004 06:17 PMIts tacitus for me!
Posted by: caribswiller at January 25, 2004 06:27 PMThe Light of Reason.
Posted by: Frederick at January 25, 2004 06:29 PMunqualified offerings
Posted by: Prince of Dirkness at January 25, 2004 06:33 PMThe Volokh Conspiracy! Volokh you run the best conspiracy. It embiggens my burstful heart.
Posted by: fafnir at January 25, 2004 06:46 PMTacitus
Posted by: shiva at January 25, 2004 06:49 PM
1 The Light of Reason by Arthur Silber
2 Just One Minute by Tom McGuire
3 Unqualified Offerings by Jim Henley
Posted by: denni at January 25, 2004 06:56 PMVolokh
Posted by: novalis at January 25, 2004 07:30 PMUnqualified Offerings.
Posted by: Charles Kuffner at January 25, 2004 07:37 PMDan Drezner
Posted by: Ted K at January 25, 2004 07:46 PMThe Light of Reason
Posted by: Lloyd at January 25, 2004 07:50 PMTacitus.
Posted by: christophe at January 25, 2004 08:22 PMLight of Reason. Glad the name of the category was changed. This fits a lot better.
Posted by: Observer at January 25, 2004 08:29 PMJim Henley/UQO
Posted by: nick at January 25, 2004 08:47 PMTacitus
Posted by: Democarp at January 25, 2004 09:00 PMTacitus
Posted by: The42ndGuy at January 25, 2004 09:07 PMTacitus, of course
Posted by: Dave's not here at January 25, 2004 10:08 PMTacitus.
Not the reason I started reading blogs, but the reason I keep reading blogs.
Posted by: engineer_charley at January 25, 2004 10:20 PMOne vote for Tacitus.
Posted by: alexis at January 25, 2004 10:21 PMOne vote for Allison Kaplan Sommer.
Posted by: Jackie D at January 25, 2004 10:30 PMHenley.
Posted by: maguzza at January 25, 2004 11:32 PMOdd isn't it that the likely winner also inspires the most antipathy among the forces of goodness? Maybe negative votes.
Posted by: David at January 25, 2004 11:54 PMI have to admit that I've never read any of these except Drezner and the Conspiracy. I'll let my junior-poli-sci-colleague loyalty trump my Conspiracy loyalty and vote for Dan.
Posted by: Jacob T. Levy at January 25, 2004 11:57 PMDan Drezner
Posted by: Jamie Irons at January 26, 2004 12:06 AMTacitus
Posted by: Big Tom E at January 26, 2004 12:19 AMTacitus
Posted by: Another One at January 26, 2004 12:19 AMTacitus
Posted by: Stewart Kelly at January 26, 2004 01:14 AMTacitus
Posted by: jl at January 26, 2004 01:40 AMThe Light of Reason by Silber
Posted by: Anna in Cairo at January 26, 2004 02:03 AMDan Drezner
Posted by: pdg at January 26, 2004 02:04 AM- Tacitus
- Drezner
Tacitus Indeed.
Posted by: Andrew at January 26, 2004 02:34 AMClassless Warfare
Posted by: Manish at January 26, 2004 02:55 AMTacitus
Posted by: eyelessgame at January 26, 2004 03:48 AMTacitus!
Posted by: Jonathan Dworkin at January 26, 2004 05:49 AMTacitus.
Posted by: Brad at January 26, 2004 05:50 AMThe Light of Reason by Arthur Silber
Posted by: jt at January 26, 2004 05:59 AMHenley's Unqualified Offerings
Posted by: Brian Linse at January 26, 2004 06:12 AMVolokh
Posted by: Andrew Edwards at January 26, 2004 07:28 AMVolokh Conspiracy
Posted by: cisko at January 26, 2004 07:42 AMDan Drezner.
Posted by: Dustin at January 26, 2004 08:13 AMTacitus...
Posted by: ChrisS at January 26, 2004 08:13 AMLight of Reason
Posted by: Hipocrite at January 26, 2004 08:29 AMLight of Reason
Posted by: Chris Sciabarra at January 26, 2004 08:38 AMTacitus.
Posted by: fabius at January 26, 2004 08:45 AMtacitus
Posted by: acassa at January 26, 2004 08:47 AMDrezner
Posted by: Duncan Young at January 26, 2004 08:49 AMa good group here: but my vote goes to Tacitus, this time round.
Anyway, there can always be a 2005 Koufax(/Drysdale) award: maybe the competition will keep blog quality high......
Posted by: Jay C. at January 26, 2004 08:52 AMTacitus
Posted by: Thyro at January 26, 2004 08:59 AMJim Henley, Unqualified Offerings
Posted by: nate at January 26, 2004 09:10 AMTacitus
Posted by: Bloodengine at January 26, 2004 09:16 AMMighty Dan's our man!
http://sisu.typepad.com/sisu/2004/01/_daniel_w_drezn.html
Posted by: Sissy Willis at January 26, 2004 09:26 AMLight of Reason
Posted by: Chirag Rabari at January 26, 2004 09:27 AMTacitus!
Posted by: Edward at January 26, 2004 09:36 AMTacitus
Posted by: edverb at January 26, 2004 09:43 AMTacitus.
Posted by: wilkins at January 26, 2004 09:52 AMDrezner
Posted by: zaoem at January 26, 2004 09:54 AMHenley, minus the fitness stuff.
Posted by: Max B. Sawicky at January 26, 2004 10:15 AMClassless Warfare, for being fair and balanced, and for Big Orange Volunteer Shower Curtains.
Posted by: skb at January 26, 2004 10:22 AMAn Unsealed Room
Posted by: ntc at January 26, 2004 10:33 AMDrezner. One word: info-tainment.
Posted by: Toomey at January 26, 2004 10:40 AMTacitus
Posted by: tg at January 26, 2004 10:42 AMAn Unsealed Room. Good uncategorizable stuff, plus it's fun to read.
Posted by: emily at January 26, 2004 11:37 AMVolokh Conspiracy (followed closely by Drezner)
Posted by: ScottM at January 26, 2004 11:38 AMDrezner
Posted by: AIJ at January 26, 2004 11:44 AMTacitus
Posted by: crionna at January 26, 2004 12:11 PMI would vote for Drezner followed by Tacitus.
These are the main places (following CalPundit, my vote for best blog above) where there is intelligent conversation between right and left with a minimum of trolls / flame wars
Posted by: marc at January 26, 2004 12:19 PMLOR--Silber's well reasoned indignation does it for me. He's an equal--if not moreso--critic of the administration as anyone out there.
Posted by: opus at January 26, 2004 12:23 PMDan Drezner
Posted by: Nate at January 26, 2004 12:30 PMDrezner
Posted by: CrudeBoy at January 26, 2004 01:10 PMTacitus, because he's not ashamed to admit he likes Dan Quayle.
Posted by: Gabriel at January 26, 2004 01:18 PMTacitus.
Posted by: James Casey at January 26, 2004 01:47 PMDan Drezner
Posted by: Steve at January 26, 2004 01:55 PMArthur Silber and Light of Reason
Posted by: Chris Cook at January 26, 2004 01:57 PMAs his mother, I am honor bound to cast a vote for Dan Drezner. I also happen to think his comments are witty, well informed and judicious. We also need to keep harmony within the family.
Posted by: Esther at January 26, 2004 02:16 PMHenley's Unqualified Offerings.
(Drezner has some excellent moments of clarity and humility.. ought to get a cash money prize award for that.)
Posted by: Zach W at January 26, 2004 02:30 PMThe Volokh Conspiracy
Posted by: lightning at January 26, 2004 02:32 PMArthur Silber's Light of Reason gets it from me.
However -- glaring omission, the best blog in the entire blogosphere as far as I can see, and non-Leftist: Eric Scheie's Classical Values.
Jim Henley, Unqualified Offerings
Posted by: Ulrika O'Brien at January 26, 2004 02:47 PMDan Drezner
Posted by: Mike Ward at January 26, 2004 02:55 PMUnqualified Offerings
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky at January 26, 2004 03:04 PMAn Unsealed Room -- go Allison!!
Posted by: Christine at January 26, 2004 03:05 PMtacitus, no doubt
Posted by: praktike at January 26, 2004 03:11 PMDrezner (with apologies to Volokh, who is just as good but already so well known.)
Posted by: David at January 26, 2004 03:15 PMAs much as I'd like to vote for the Talking Dog, I think he's really a liberal. So I'l take Drezner.
Posted by: JP at January 26, 2004 03:39 PMHenley
Posted by: maurinsky at January 26, 2004 03:39 PMAs I am nobody's mother, I am not bound by familial loyalty to vote for anyone. Therefore, I vote my true feelings - for Tacitus.
Besides, my wife voted for Tacitus, so maybe there is some merit in harmony.
Posted by: Dave's not here at January 26, 2004 03:47 PMvolokh
Posted by: Raznor at January 26, 2004 04:16 PMDrezner.
Disqualified:
Tacitus - he's fine; his guest posters are unworthy
The Talking Dog - not a conservative
The Talking Dog
Posted by: JNelsonW at January 26, 2004 04:42 PMUnqualified Offerings
Posted by: Tom Larson at January 26, 2004 05:04 PMthe talking dog. the most fun to read. Though hardly non-liberal.
Posted by: shamiqua at January 26, 2004 05:10 PMLight of Reason, hands down...I haven't
found anything as insightful or informative.
An Unsealed Room
Posted by: chiripa1 at January 26, 2004 05:16 PMThe Light of Reason
Posted by: Timothy at January 26, 2004 05:18 PMLight of Reason
Posted by: ShookB at January 26, 2004 05:29 PMTacitus
Posted by: Jesse B at January 26, 2004 05:30 PMTacitus
Posted by: Mork at January 26, 2004 05:56 PMI would've nominated A Small Victory, but Michele made it very clear she doesn't want ASV put up for any awards (something about extracting several major organs with a spork....) Therefore, I will vote for An Unsealed Room.
Posted by: Thlayli at January 26, 2004 06:04 PMTacitus.
Posted by: Rhesa at January 26, 2004 06:05 PMTacitus.
Posted by: VR at January 26, 2004 06:13 PMDan Drezner
Posted by: David V at January 26, 2004 06:15 PMDan Drezner
Posted by: David V at January 26, 2004 06:15 PMOops, I posted twice.
Posted by: David V at January 26, 2004 06:19 PMtacitus
Posted by: dirk strom at January 26, 2004 06:48 PMUnqualified Offerings
Posted by: Arthur D. Hlavaty at January 26, 2004 07:54 PMHenley/Silber
Posted by: Neil Eden at January 26, 2004 08:27 PMI'm caught between Silber and Henley.
OK, I'm voting for Silber on the grounds that Tacitus voted for Henley.
Posted by: Avedon at January 26, 2004 09:15 PMLight of Reason
Posted by: djn at January 26, 2004 10:25 PMUnqualified Offerings
Screw 'em. They all suck.
Posted by: QuakerinaBasement at January 26, 2004 10:57 PMOK, I take it back. Not one lousy vote for Classless Warfare? Sure, Jay's a big sorehead, but he's the one guy that's sure to rouse me to post a comment. One for Jay.
Posted by: QuakerinaBasement at January 26, 2004 11:00 PMtacitus
Posted by: timshel at January 26, 2004 11:03 PMAn Unsealed Room
Posted by: Laura at January 26, 2004 11:23 PMAllison at An Unsealed Room
Posted by: Matt at January 27, 2004 12:54 AMAmen to that. Another "Allison at An Unsealed Room", please.
Posted by: Sid at January 27, 2004 01:03 AMThe Light of Reason.
Posted by: meatspx at January 27, 2004 02:56 AMArthur at The Light of Reason, definitely.
Posted by: Ray Radlein at January 27, 2004 03:39 AMLight of Reason by a mile
Posted by: Mark Wain at January 27, 2004 06:13 AMClassless Warfare
Posted by: Michael Demmons at January 27, 2004 06:28 AMTacitus
Posted by: eric at January 27, 2004 09:16 AM(Eugene) Volokh
Posted by: James W at January 27, 2004 10:03 AMi'd like a glass of "classless warfare" please.
Posted by: mr. helpful at January 27, 2004 10:09 AMI vote for Unqualified Offerings
Posted by: Bill at January 27, 2004 11:08 AMI've got to put up Jay at Classlesswarfare. That's my vote.
Posted by: fatman at January 27, 2004 11:24 AMLight Of Reason deserves top honors. Arthur is intelligent, witty, informed, ironic, and above all else: no loyalties. He needs to be out there big-time, with all due respect for "blogging."
http://www.blog.light-of-reason.com
Posted by: Neil at January 27, 2004 11:39 AMLight of Reason
Posted by: lastone at January 27, 2004 12:34 PMDrezner
Posted by: M.Callahan at January 27, 2004 03:04 PMTacitus.
And what is "The Talking Dog" even doing in this category?
Posted by: David Block at January 27, 2004 05:46 PMThe Light of Reason
Silber is passionate, consistent and logical. The only non-liberal blog I read regularly.
Posted by: mark ganzer at January 27, 2004 08:32 PMThe Light of Reason. I don't always agree with Arthur -- but he always makes me think.
What is this? A democracy?
Arthur seems outnumbered here, so the least I could do is vote for him!
Posted by: Eric Scheie at January 28, 2004 01:16 AMOne vote for the Light of Reason.
Posted by: Jonathan Rick at January 28, 2004 01:40 AMDan Drezner
Posted by: detlef at January 28, 2004 12:42 PMThe Light of Reason
Posted by: David W. at January 28, 2004 01:19 PMLight of Reason, no question.
Posted by: Vern at January 28, 2004 02:14 PMTacitus
Posted by: Adri Overgaauw at January 28, 2004 08:24 PMAllison's unsealed room
Posted by: pridgter at January 29, 2004 02:57 AMthe volokh conspiracy for proving even right wingers get it every once in a while.
Posted by: Mark McKenna at January 29, 2004 12:05 PMHow are people voting for Tacitus? He only writes a sentence or two and links to stories. Drezner, OTOH, quotes the story and states well thought out and supported opinions. I already voted so whoever's counting don't count this
Posted by: David V at January 29, 2004 06:46 PMBest Righty Blog - Volokh Conspiracy
Posted by: Rob Sobak at January 30, 2004 11:02 AM
Dan Drezner
Another vote for Dan Drezner.
The light of reason-Arthur Sibler
Posted by: Bill Rushmore at January 30, 2004 06:37 PMDrezner
Posted by: Tim Danford at January 31, 2004 05:39 PMLight of Reason
Posted by: nochnaya babochka at February 1, 2004 05:14 PMLight of Reason
Posted by: Initials CB at February 1, 2004 07:38 PMLight of Reason!
Posted by: Jutso at February 4, 2004 01:51 PM